In men, the organs of the senses allow us to experience a world that is the perception of what, being an existence differentiated from ourselves, is assumed and valued as a potentiality with which to compensate for its deficiencies.
However, it happens that regardless of assuming and valuing the world that surrounds us as something different from ourselves, since this abstraction is related to the one that we have valued and assumed during the course in which we have been experiencing these deficiencies, which in principle could have been the circumstantial reparation of a claim, it becomes a claim that we project over time.
Which leads us to conclude that this projection concurs with a connotation of transcendence. Something that elevating us above matter, would supposedly be providing us with a certain excellence that, if it were true, unfortunately we have not known how to take advantage of it.
To try to find out what this represents we have to notice the incidents that had to occur in the appearance of what we know as organic matter; as well as those that occurred so that life could be generated and the ascent of the first steps of perception.
In this regard, I think I understand that a series of processes had to be initiated that, adapting to the environment in which the evolution had to develop, regardless of the time required to carry out this process, this development was shaped as a way of physically projecting in the future.
A development devoid of spirituality and exclusively determined by the fact that, faced with an antecedent that was supposed to be rigidly determining what its consequent would have to be, depending on the multiple factors that concur in evolution, what would be punctually subjected to the determinism, led him to manifest in a totally random way.
A randomness that in the field of what constitutes the psychic as a partially liberated evolution (as in the previous jumps that it carried out in its course), must continue to have an independent directionality and at the same time determined by the trajectory in which it takes place. has developed.
That is to say, it has to be reintegrated to that trajectory from which it tried to make an essay. Based on the above, what we have to ask ourselves is if what we know as the ability to reason represents the manifestation of a phenomenology that, combining the awareness of our demands with its projection in time, constitutes a real entity that has its own experience, or if, on the contrary, it is only the externalization of a virtuality that, like the existence of a shadow, permanently needs the support and the existence of the light that makes it possible.
PS The content of these articles are part of the work Is another market economy possible? and what is made explicit in them is intended to investigate human nature in order, based on its analysis, to forge the guidelines with which to develop its content.