It is an unprecedented victory and for many observers of democracy in Europe it is also an earthquake. According to the almost final results announced yesterday, it is therefore an unprecedented bloc bringing together both right and extreme right which won the general elections in Sweden by a very small majority. With 176 seats, this block is very slightly ahead of that of the left (173 seats). But above all, the shift is historic since never before has a government relied in parliament on the Democrats of Sweden, this anti-immigration formation heir to a neo-Nazi group and which with 20.6% of the vote has risen to the rank of second party in the country (behind the Social Democrats) but first party on the right ahead of the Moderates, the Christian Democrats and the Liberals.
Now, the whole difficulty for this narrow majority ranging from the centre-right to the extreme right will be how to govern. A priori the three parties of the traditional right are unfavorable to the ambition displayed by the extreme right to be part of the government. The most likely scenario is that they only support the government in parliament, but are not directly part of it.
To view this Twitter content, you must accept cookies Social Networks.
These cookies make it possible to share or react directly on the social networks to which you are connected or to integrate content initially posted on these social networks. They also allow social networks to use your visits to our sites and applications for the purposes of personalization and advertising targeting.
Other news headlines
Even though President Zelensky yesterday promised victory from the Kharkiv region, almost entirely freed from occupation, massive strikes were still carried out by the invading army. In particular in Mykolaiv in the South, one of the most bombed in the country. This is where our correspondent Maurine Mercier went to measure the morale of the Ukrainian fighters, tested by these 6 months of war, but also to collect their confidences both on the psychological impact of this conflict and their relations with the population, more difficult than it seems.
In Uzbekistan, a regional summit will be held from today, resembling a front facing the West, the culmination of which will be the meeting between the two masters of centralization and the personalization of power: the Chinese President Xi Jinping on one side and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin on the other.
Elisabeth Borne yesterday presented her battle plan to get through the winter. While repeating her calls for sobriety and therefore for energy solidarity, the Prime Minister announced the capping of the rise in gas and electricity prices for all at 15% next year. And then at the same time, the government promised to introduce a new energy check for 12 million households. But the amounts of one and the other are disproportionate: 45 billion euros for the tariff shield and 1 billion 800 million for the energy check. Preference has therefore very clearly been given to a non-targeting measure (the famous tariff shield) which will help both the wealthiest and the most precarious.
Ten long years of investigation will not have been too much to document the law of silence which too long will have weighed on the abuses of certain followers of Tibetan spirituality. This week, two journalists, Elodie Emery and Wandrille Lanos, publish a book – Buddhism, the law of silence – with Lattès editions, at the same time as they exhibit in a documentary broadcast on Arte several cases of sexual abuse, particularly of minors, which took place in very powerful Buddhist communities in the 1980s and 90s.
Cécile de Kervasdoué watched this documentary
Guest editor: Elodie Emery, journalist, columnist and co-director of this documentary, who began investigating these abuses in 2011.
“We had direct testimonies from 32 victims targeting a dozen different Buddhist masters, but this is the tip of the iceberg”
This documentary aroused many reactions after its broadcast, in particular from the media figure of Buddhism in France Matthieu Ricard, who claims to have condemned this violence and abuse by the gurus of Tibetan Buddhism on French soil. Mathieu Ricard who nevertheless obtained to have the interview he had granted to the two journalists removed from the documentary. The Buddhist Union of France, it is pleased that speech is freed but rejects the idea of a system around these abuses. When sociologist Raphaël Liogier, a specialist in representations of Buddhism and himself practicing this religion, believes that it is high time to clean up Western Buddhism.
Raphaël Liogier: “This documentary is very interesting because it allows us to get out of fascination”